So I mentioned a while back that I was reading *Arithmetic*. I did pretty well with it for a while; Lockhart has an engaging writing style, and his was by far the best explanation of thinking in anything other than base 10 that I’ve come across.

…But, yes, there’s a but. I’m nearing the end now–I’ve just gotten to the bit about fractions–and I’m flagging. I’m no longer wowed by the different perspectives you can take on how all of this works, and I’m starting to think he’s annoyingly glib at times.

I’ve spent some time as I read *Arithmetic* trying to decide who I would recommend this book to. It’s not really for children, for all that I think children are the ones who could benefit most from the different takes on how arithmetic works, and interesting points of view as those takes are explained. Adults can just use a calculator if they don’t enjoy doing the arithmetic themselves, as Lockhart points out every few pages. Kids, though–kids are stuck in school math classes where they’re graded on this stuff, and not tracked into the actually interesting math until/unless they master arithmetic. But this isn’t really a book for kids.

Maybe it would be good for the parent or tutor of a kid struggling with math? Or anyone who teaches math to elementary schoolers, I suppose.

Anyway, I’m not 100% sure whether or not I’ll finish this one. I might. But then again, I’ve already stumbled across *Music and the Making of Modern Science* while trying to find stuff to buy for collection development. I’m not sure I can justify buying it for the library… but I can certainly justify ILLing it for myself! Maybe this one will be the bedtime reading I’ve been waiting for. It could be, right?

In other news, I think I saw a house finch yesterday, and I’ve definitely seen crocuses in bloom in two different places. It’s spring! And *See You Around* has been on repeat in my office and apartment for the past couple days. That has nothing to do with spring, but it’s always nice to have new music as you usher in a new season.